Completing Party

Hi @jlane

Thanks for revisiting this. We were hoping it would be possible to consider this post as a potential solution.

I realize @thor mentioned there are internal challenges with getting approval for this, but it seems if we had that in place, changes to the architecture with respect to the completing party would be relatively minimal.

  • Users that access the system outside of an API partner are required to use their BCeID, so seemingly something is already in place to facilitate use of the BCeID.
  • The person that’s associated with the BCeID would be the completing party ;
  • Any filing confirmations would be sent to the person that has logged in using their BCeID, addressing any potential privacy concerns;
  • Potential creation of a “submitting party ID”, for recording of the API partner doing the submission.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

1 Like